home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!vtserf!polaris.async.vt.edu!jsciv
- From: jsciv@polaris.async.vt.edu (Joseph Cochran)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
- Subject: Re: ***** Proposed RFD: c.s.i.p.g reorganization -- please examine
- Message-ID: <C1BI9H.1ou@polaris.async.vt.edu>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 17:36:52 GMT
- References: <C12wxJ.5yM@polaris.async.vt.edu> <1993Jan22.200026.27650@cs.uwp.edu> <lm14mcINN1kn@tokio.cs.utexas.edu>
- Organization: Escape from Blacksburg, VA
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <lm14mcINN1kn@tokio.cs.utexas.edu> graham@cs.utexas.edu (Ralph Arnold Graham) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan22.200026.27650@cs.uwp.edu> shaub@cs.uwp.edu (Jeffery Shaub) writes:
- >
- >I concur with Jeff, but we could possibly take this a step further -
- >combining advocacy and announce. It is often the case that after
- >there is an announcement, the ensuing discussion becomes one of
- >advocacy. The net is *loaded* with newsgroups. As it stands now,
-
- But announce is to be a low traffic moderated group. There
- will be NO discussion in announce, only announcements of information
- that are widely useful. No debates, no replies, no threads. Just
- announcements. Followups will go to misc.
- I'm still wondering if advocacy can go into misc, though.
-
-
- [comments about splits splitting over and over]
-
- That's why I want to make this a good split that will not need
- re-splitting. That's also why we're discussing it now.
- *--Joe--*
- jsciv@polaris.async.vt.edu
-