home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews2.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!nordruth!seurer
- From: seurer@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Bill Seurer)
- Subject: Re: V for Victory planned scenarios
- Sender: news@rchland.ibm.com
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.194731.11431@rchland.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:47:31 GMT
- Reply-To: BillSeurer@vnet.ibm.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1993Jan19.160424.26747@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com> <1993Jan19.172628.22874@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan21.131954.8907@zooid.guild.org>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: nordruth.rchland.ibm.com
- Organization: IBM Rochester
- Keywords: V for Victory, Scenarios, Guadalcanal
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1993Jan21.131954.8907@zooid.guild.org>, Hobie Orris <hobie@zooid.guild.org> writes:
- |>
- |> Guadalcanal was one of my first thoughts, too. Also, the air invasion of
- |> Crete or Operation Crusader in the desert might be interesting.
- |>
- |> Hobie
-
- While really interesting, Guadalcanal would involve big changes to the
- system since both sides had active fleets in the area.
-
- I like the though of the Crete scenario. Especially given the great
- flexibility shown in the 2 scenarios so far as far as historical
- options go.
- --
-
- - Bill Seurer Language and Compiler Development IBM Rochester, MN
- Internet: BillSeurer@vnet.ibm.com America On-Line: BillSeurer@aol.com
-