home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.noc.drexel.edu!noc.ocs.drexel.edu!tslopez
- From: tslopez@mcs.Drexel.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
- Subject: Re: HP48S vs. HP48SX
- Message-ID: <TSLOPEZ.93Jan21225010@queen.mcs.Drexel.edu>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 03:50:10 GMT
- References: <19930121.152847.119@almaden.ibm.com>
- Sender: news@netnews.noc.drexel.edu
- Organization: Drexel University
- Lines: 31
- In-Reply-To: heavy-metal@vnet.ibm.com's message of 21 Jan 93 23:25:41 GMT
-
- >>>>> On 21 Jan 93 23:25:41 GMT, heavy-metal@vnet.ibm.com said:
-
-
-
- >> No difference, just two slots, a removable cover and $100.
- >>
- >> BTW I have a 48s and I am quite happy with it. I too am too poor e SX,
- >> but with my computer I have a 48 with a 50 meg hard drive.
- >> Top that.
- >>
- >> Brian Badger
-
-
- :> I have an SX with a 128K, a 512K and with my computer I have an extra
- :> 16Meg, a 160Meg hard drive and a 1Gb hard drive. Did I top ya? Sorry,
- :> but I had to . . .
-
- :> Bob
-
- Nothing personal, but I have to agree. If you're going to spend the $150 for
- an HP why not go the extra $90 or so and get something with a future. 32k
- is simply not enough for something with the power of a 48s. I am glad I have
- my 128k card and plan on getting a 512k card sometime soon. And that's with
- also having it linked to my Mac with over 2 gigs of storage. (Though it's
- not all dedicated to the HP ;)
-
- --
- (__) | Scott J. Lopez tslopez@mcs.drexel.edu
- ( oo _ The Cow Says |
- /\_| / "Automatic!" | A man doesn't automatically get my respect.
- | He has to get down in the dirt and beg for it.
-