home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!not-for-mail
- From: jgolds@math.ohio-state.edu (Jeffrey A Golds)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
- Subject: Re: What are we supposed to do for 1024*768?! (reg. Amiga World art. )
- Date: 21 Jan 1993 01:20:28 -0500
- Organization: Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <1jlfbcINNp3m@function.mps.ohio-state.edu>
- References: <dmkasten.04ou@redorc.chi.il.us> <C0r2Ap.Cq5@javelin.sim.es.com> <1j7kllINNguo@early-bird.think.com> <1993Jan16.021456.5886@athena.mit.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: function.mps.ohio-state.edu
-
-
- I hope Commodore upgrades the AGA chips before they produce a graphics
- board with the AGA for the A2000 and A3000. I don't understand why
- Commodore uses such slow refresh rates on the AGA, why not 30 htz +
- like most good boards (and monitors!) support? I have a NEC 4d monitor
- and without the ECS scan rate doubler, it would be worthless.
- I.e. it can't sync down low enough. I don't see this as a fault of
- the monitor though, it is excellent. But what good are refresh rates
- of say 20 htz if you want to do vidoe production? doesn't this imply
- you are limited to 20 frames per second? Worthless...
- 30 frames per second is minimal and more would be even better.
-
- Just a few thoughts.
- Jeff
-
- (I hope I'm not too wrong about this stuff, I just bought my A3000)
-
-
-
-