home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!ieunet!tcdcs!scollins
- From: scollins@cs.tcd.ie (Steven Collins)
- Subject: Re: BPPro is terrible...whats KCS like ?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.142530.15930@cs.tcd.ie>
- Organization: Trinity College, Dublin (Computer Science)
- References: <1993Jan25.161032.25183@tpl68k0.tplrd.tpl.oz.au>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:25:30 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1993Jan25.161032.25183@tpl68k0.tplrd.tpl.oz.au> markb@tplrd.tpl.oz.au (Mark Bower) writes:
- >Now, before I switch to an Atari ST (I'm that desperate!), I want
- >to know if Dr T's KCS II 3.5 is any better. I need:
- >
- > - Fast editing of Note data
- > - Proper SOFT MIDI THRU capability
- > - Reliable timing
- > - Good real time entry - no glitching.
- > - No crashes or GURU's for normal program operation.
-
- Forget it. For MIDI sequencing, and I'm talking real MIDI sequencing,
- not driving internal Amiga samples etc. you can forget the Amiga. I've
- tried just about every sequencer out there, and they're all flawed in
- one way or another. Get an ST and do yourself a favour. Cubase does
- all you will ever need, v3.0 does more than you will never need. There
- is light years difference between something like Cubase and Music-X,
- B&P, KCS, Seq-One, DMCS, MED, or anything else you care to mention on
- the Amiga. Its a real shame this, because the Amiga is a better machine
- it simply does not have the software support. Why can't Cubase be
- released on the Amiga, I have an Amiga, all my stuff is on an Amiga, but
- I had to buy an ST for a decent sequencer.
-
- Flame away, but forget the Amiga for sequencing.
-
- Steven Collins
- scollins@cs.tcd.ie
-
-
-