home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!walker
- From: walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker)
- Subject: Re: SAS 6.2 update
- Originator: walker@twix.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Message-ID: <C1EwtM.5sI@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:44:10 GMT
- References: <1993Jan23.160343.20155@crash> <1993Jan24.031529.9894@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1jt8fuINNqaj@crcnis1.unl.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: twix.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 30
-
-
- In article <1jt8fuINNqaj@crcnis1.unl.edu>, pdietz@cse.unl.edu (Phil Dietz) writes:
- |> cmatting@nyx.cs.du.edu (Chris Mattingly) writes:
- |> >Umm, pardon me, but are you talking about the SAS/C compiler? If so, then
- |> >they need to get their marketing scheme together, because in the latest issue
- |> >of Amiga World, they did a review and had advertisements for 6.0, not 6.2
- |>
- |>
- |> That's exactly the point. A typical magazine ad/review takes
- |> 2 to 3 months. Unless a company knows that they will be producing
- |> version X in 3 months, they are forced to send version X-N
- |> to the printer...
- |>
- |> A new update before the ad means "REALLY quick" updates.
-
- Also, I believe our ad only mentions "Version 6", which is a proper
- description of 6.2. 6.2 is "Version 6, revision 2". The review
- does mention 6.0, but that is accurate since that's the version
- actually reviewed.
-
-
- --
- *****
- =*|_o_o|\\=====Doug Walker, Software Distiller====== BBS: (919)460-7430 =
- *|. o.| || 1200/2400/9600 Dual
- | o |// For all you do, this bug's for you!
- ======
- usenet: walker@unx.sas.com bix: djwalker
- Any opinions expressed are mine, not those of SAS Institute, Inc.
-
-