home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!piccolo.cit.cornell.edu!crux2!dra2
- From: dra2@crux2.cit.cornell.edu (Daniel Allen)
- Subject: Re: PowerSnap, MegaSnap, oSnap, Snap...
- Message-ID: <dra2.727685221@crux1.cit.cornell.edu>
- Keywords: Snip, snap, snop, snep, snup, 040, aggression, insanity, blah.
- Sender: news@piccolo.cit.cornell.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux2.cit.cornell.edu
- Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
- References: <Twin-Peaks.02zb@fbi.amigans.gen.nz> <C15CI0.D0y@lysator.liu.se>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 06:47:01 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- cmh@lysator.liu.se (Magnus Holmgren) writes:
-
- >Twin-Peaks@fbi.amigans.gen.nz (Dale Cooper) writes:
-
- >>Then he getting POWER hungry and buys a PP&S 040. Blah blah blah blah...
-
- >> WHY DOESN'T ***ANY*** SNAPPER WORK ON MY COMPUTER NOW??????
-
- >> ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!
-
- >>I can snap perfectly, but on oSnap if I snap to quickly, the
- >>program/mouse/computer locks up and I have to reset. Does anyone (Nico
- >>included) know why this does this? The ONLY one which works is the
- >>standard Amiga snap which leaves ALOT to be desired, actually it leaves
- >>ALOT to be even accepted as a Snapper! Whats the story? Is it YET ANOTHER
- >>clash with WB2.1 and my 040? Why are all programmers so incredibly scared
- >>of 040's? :-)
-
- >Are you sure you have tested the latest version of PowerSnap (2.1b)?
- >I would be very surprised if PowerSnap failed because of an 040. 2.1
- >shouldn't cause any problems either (if it did, a new version would
- >most likely have been released... :)
-
- PowerSnap most certainly works under 2.1! Thank you Nico! :-)
-
- >--
- > Magnus Holmgren | Email: cmh@lysator.liu.se, cmh@augs.se | FIDO: 2:204/404.6
- >Comp. Science & Engineering student, Linkoping Institute of Technology, Sweden
-