home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!matt.ksu.ksu.edu!news
- From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
- Newsgroups: comp.security.misc
- Subject: Re: Unix Viruses. Are there any??
- Message-ID: <1k13r3INNmlo@matt.ksu.ksu.edu>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 04:17:39 GMT
- Article-I.D.: matt.1k13r3INNmlo
- References: <1jotp8INNiu@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> <C1EwxL.n55@sse.ie>
- Organization: Kansas State University
- Lines: 26
- NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu
-
- odwyer@sse.ie (Frank ODwyer) writes:
-
- >probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon) writes:
- >: senetza@sigma.uleth.ca (Len Senetza) writes:
- >: >this assumes that root has . in its path, and how many root accounts
- >: >out there do?
- >:
- >: No, this assumes root has . at the FRONT of his/her path.
-
- >Nope. At the end will do.
-
- >$ cd /tmp
- >$ sl -l
-
- >: James
-
- >--
- >Frank O'Dwyer
- >odwyer@sse.ie
-
- That is true, except it probably wouldn't get me for 2 reasons.
-
- 1) I don't have . in any path on any system I use.
- 2) sl is aliased to ls :-) (I mistype a lot)
-
- James
-