home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!alsys1!yu1.yu.edu!manaster
- From: manaster@yu1.yu.edu (Chaim Manaster)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
- Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 on 486/33 - double buffering
- Message-ID: <1329@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 23:16:41 GMT
- References: <1993Jan19.220908.2500@ucbeh.san.uc.edu> <14272@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu
- Organization: School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, UCLA
- Lines: 30
- Nntp-Posting-Host: yu1.yu.edu
-
- >> If SmartDrive is unsure its
- >>a good idea to install in anyway.
- >
- >I disagree. Trying it on my SCSI drive, the start-up time of windows
- >doubles with double buffering installed. And this also reflects on all
-
- Fine, but if you then discover that you needed double buffering,
- what consequences have you suffered.
-
- In other words, if your system needs double buffering and you did
- not invoke it what disasters befall your system. Are these
- consequences gradual, or do they occur in one fell swoop. Where do
- you look to find these consequences that may or may not occur.
-
- What is it about SCSI and ESDI drives (Ihave one of each) that
- incur the wrath of no double buffering?
-
- Thanks for the info.
-
- Henry Manaster
-
- --
- ***************************************************************************
- Henry Manaster * EMail: manaster@yu1.yu.edu
- Brooklyn, NY *
- *
- Disclaimer: The above is not necessarily MY opinion nor that
- of anyone else :-) ????!
- ****************************************************************************
-
-