home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!sun4nl!freya.let.rug.nl!pc4308g.let.rug.nl!s0522457
- From: s0522457@let.rug.nl (L.E. Plat)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
- Subject: Re: Comparison of ARJ 2.3 and PKZip 2.04 and 1.1 (Was: pkzip 2.04c uploaded to w)
- Message-ID: <s0522457.20.0@let.rug.nl>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 15:21:59 GMT
- References: <1993Jan9.859.6057@execnet> <1993Jan9.133357.10027@ac.dal.ca> <1993Jan13.230958.141784@zeus.calpoly.edu> <1993Jan14.113037.22314@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1993Jan14.122504.330@ghost.dsi.unimi.it> <rdippold.727036230@cancun> <exuptr.663.0@exu.ericOrganization
- Sender: news@let.rug.nl (news manager)
- Organization: Faculteit der Letteren, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, NL
- Lines: 15
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pc4308g.let.rug.nl
-
- >Subject: Re: Comparison of ARJ 2.3 and PKZip 2.04 and 1.1 (Was: pkzip 2.04c uploaded to w)
- [STUFF DELETED]
-
- >Mr. Jung has some speed to address, but PKWARE may address their bug
- >problems also. For some reason, the copy I got from them seems to be
- >missing some of these bugs, but I'm also running a real straight setup.
- >
-
- I'd rather have a slow, but correct ARJ file than a fast, but sloppy
- ZIP file. Especially when I've only got one copy.
-
- Just my $.02.
-
- Bert Plat
- mail to: bplat@rugrcx.rug.nl
-