home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.org.sug:622 comp.org.usenix:1354 comp.unix.wizards:5593 comp.unix.bsd:11669
- Newsgroups: comp.org.sug,comp.org.usenix,comp.unix.wizards,comp.unix.bsd,news.sys-admin
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!netcomsv!netcom.com!bitbug
- From: bitbug@netcom.com (James Buster)
- Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of lp/lpr and friends
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.192822.7976@netcom.com>
- Organization: Lynx Real-Time Systems, Inc.
- References: <C15sst.JqA@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1993Jan21.124947.8297@csc.ti.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:28:22 GMT
- Lines: 7
-
- My question is, why not standardize a general-purpose batch and queueing
- mechanism that happens to work for print spooling than just specify a
- print spooler? This seems to me much more useful and elegant than the
- current 1003.7 effort.
- --
- James Buster
- bitbug@netcom.com
-