home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!Germany.EU.net!donald!hasko
- From: hasko@heeg.de (Hasko Heinecke)
- Subject: Re: Voluntary method typing in ST80
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.134548.7255@heeg.de>
- Organization: Georg Heeg Objektorientierte Systeme, Dortmund, FRG
- References: <9301191709.AA21420@bean.open.ac.uk> <74216@cup.portal.com> <1993Jan25.070651.2105@cs.uow.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:45:48 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1993Jan25.070651.2105@cs.uow.edu.au> humm@cs.uow.edu.au (Bernhard G Humm) writes:
- >>>Of course, this only applies to database-type objects which just have
- >>>get/set behaviour, but this seems quite a significant subset.
- >
- >Are there really any other cases in a pure OO language?
-
- Are there really _such_ cases in a pure OO project?
-
- Hasko
-
- --
- +-------------------------------------------------------+
- | Hasko Heinecke @ Georg Heeg Objektorientierte Systeme |
- | I _never_ mean what I say - and nobody else does... |
- +-------------------------------------------------------+
-