home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!umassd.edu!SMUCS1.UMASSD.EDU!S14250DY
- From: s14250dy@UMASSD.EDU
- Subject: Re: TP6 private
- Message-ID: <C1FAnJ.8ur@umassd.edu>
- Sender: usenet@umassd.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: s14250dy@UMASSD.EDU
- Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
- References: <35091@adm.brl.mil>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:42:54 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <35091@adm.brl.mil>, lee@cpu.us.dynix.com (Lee Crites) writes:
- >It is my understanding that you only have to include the last generation
- >in your program's USES clause, since all of the other info/data/methods
- >will be a part of that one by inheritance. This assumption is based upon
- >the fact that if UNIT A has UNIT B in it's USES clause, then the program
- >itself only has to have B in it's USES clause.
- >
- >If I'm wrong on that point, please let me know. We are just at this point
- >going through all of our standing units and ADT's and converting them to OOP.
-
- I think what you meant is that the program would only have to have A in its
- USES clause.
-
-