home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.lang.c:20285 comp.lang.c++:20004
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!erc
- From: erc@netcom.com (Eric Smith)
- Subject: Re: discriminated unions (Re: C/C++ Correctness (was: Re: C/C++ Speed))
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.082020.13143@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1993Jan21.004105.1335@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <1993Jan21.075642.6482@netcom.com> <1993Jan26.204305.24612@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:20:20 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <1993Jan26.204305.24612@ucc.su.OZ.AU> maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller) writes:
- [about the advantages of discriminated unions]
-
-
- You and Thomas Breuel both make a good case for discriminated unions.
- After the standard is published, if it doesn't include such features as
- discriminated unions and nested functions, I and others will probably
- add them as extensions.
-