home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!tghost!cutting!david.brooks
- From: david.brooks@cutting.hou.tx.us (David Brooks)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Conversion of BASIC c
- Message-ID: <11434.107.uupcb@cutting.hou.tx.us>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 4:23:00 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: The Cutting Edge - Houston, TX - 713-466-1525
- Reply-To: david.brooks@cutting.hou.tx.us (David Brooks)
- Lines: 27
-
- RMH> I am tired of hearing this! I don't care what they claim, but that
- RMH> new language with functions, subroutines, etc is NOT BASIC! They've
- RMH> reinvented Algol or Pascal, or something, but >BASIC< is the language
- RMH> with numbers on every line that you find on C64, Atari 800 and old
- RMH> Apples.
- RMH> You know, the one that already has billions of variants even before
- RMH> trying to bring in an entirely new structured language and giving it
- RMH> the same name? To call the new language by the same name is a
- RMH> disservice
- RMH> to everyone still making use of the real one.
-
- RMH> -Richard Hartman
- RMH> hartman@uLogic.COM
-
- What should we call a language that will compile old BASIC code and yet
- adds functions, subroutines, etc., which still looks a lot like BASIC but
- with added flexibility? How about BASIC++ ? =)
-
- David
- david.brooks@cutting.hou.tx.us
-
- * Q-Blue v0.7 [NR] *
- ----
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | The Cutting Edge BBS (cutting.hou.tx.us) A PCBoard 14.5a system |
- | Houston, Texas, USA +1 713 466 1525 running uuPCB |
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
-