home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!hwcs!hwcs!sfleming
- From: sfleming@cee.hw.ac.uk (Stewart T Fleming)
- Newsgroups: comp.human-factors
- Subject: Re: Computer vs paper administered questionnaires
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.092842.3787@cs.hw.ac.uk>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 09:28:42 GMT
- References: <C17zLw.B9B@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
- Sender: news@cs.hw.ac.uk (News Administrator)
- Reply-To: sfleming@cee.hw.ac.uk
- Organization: Dept. Of Computing and Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
- Lines: 51
-
-
- In article <C17zLw.B9B@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>, kruus@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Kaia Kruus) writes:
-
- >I have heard that subjects would answer a
- >questionnaire differently according to whether
- >it was administered on paper or through a computer.
- [...]
- >papers. Can anybody suggest where I might look
- >to find relevant studies?
-
- The only reference I found to motivation rates in "HCI literature" when
- I was looking at electronic questionnaires was a single line in
- David Meister's book :
-
- Meister, D., 1985. Behavioural and Quantitative Data Analysis.
- Wiley, New York.
-
- Chapter 10 : Self-Report Techniques. He makes the suggestion that participants
- MAY be more motivated to answer a questionnaire administered through
- a computer.
-
- The only other reference I found was :
-
- Sproull, L., 1986. Using Electronic Mail for Data Collection in
- Organizational Research. Academy of Management Journal 29(1). 159-169.
-
- Several factors critical to the success of an electronic administration
- scheme are detailed in this paper. I'm not aware of any development in this
- area since then, but I may not have looked hard enough :-)
-
- I have implemented a system for distributing electronic questionnaires to
- participants by e-mail and to provide Motif-based user interfaces for
- filling in the questionnaires. I have no evidence at the moment to suggest
- that response rates are affected EITHER way. This MAY be due to background
- administration in setting up the system and making sure it is transparent
- to participants - not an easy task on a large, diverse network.
-
- Studies are on-going; we hope to foster a culture where such questionnaires
- are commonplace and hence we would hope for a dramatic increase in
- repsonse rates. At the moment, I think that 25% of the original distribution
- is about all you can expect, for either paper or electronic administered
- questionnaires.
-
- > u - Kaia Kruus
-
- STF
- --
- sfleming@cee.hw.ac.uk, sfleming@icbl.hw.ac.uk
- "...but if I'd known the roses/Wouldn't last until the winter/
- I would have been myself/Maybe I could have been somebody..."
- --Carol Laula, _Restless_
-