home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!ricksys!news
- From: rick@ricksys.lonestar.org (Richard McCombs KB5SNF)
- Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
- Subject: Re: Why we use Waffle
- Message-ID: <930125.205648.0P6.rusnews.w165w@ricksys.lonestar.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 20:56:48 CST
- References: <C12u0C.266@techbook.com> <TTXmXB3w165w@1776.COM> <EpyXrAJKBh107h@mala.proteus.qc.ca>
- Organization: The Red Headed League; Lawton, OK, USA
- X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.98
- Lines: 21
-
- ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry) writes:
-
- > In <TTXmXB3w165w@1776.COM> bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe) writes:
- >
- >>This brings up an interesting point: What percentage of the Waffle community
- >>actually runs a BBS or cares about Waffle's ability to support one? For my
- [...]
- >
- > If I didnt want to run a BBS I would give up Waffle and use other
- > UUCP systems. For one thing, Unix is much better than MS-DOS and comes
- > with UUCP communication utilities. There is even a free clone, called
- > Linux available for IBM PC clones, i386 and above.
-
- I use waffle because it is the best package that will do UUCP and news
- on an 8088.
-
- --
- Internet: rick@ricksys.lonestar.org
- If I bounce (the maps have errors that I have no control over) then use
- bo836@cleveland.freenet.edu
- BITNET: bo836%cleveland.freenet.edu@cunyvm
-