home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.ai.philosophy:7393 sci.philosophy.tech:4971
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!emory!cs.utk.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!bounce-bounce
- From: chandra@cis.ohio-state.edu (B Chandrasekaran)
- Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: Searle on animal consciousness
- Date: 25 Jan 1993 17:08:49 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <1k1odhINN5p7@cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.edu>
- References: <1993Jan24.213358.10067@sophia.smith.edu> <1jvevlINN4va@cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1993Jan25.105152.5776dave@tygra.Michigan.COM>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan25.105152.5776dave@tygra.Michigan.COMDC: dave@tygra.Michigan.COM (David Conrad) writes:
- DC: In article <1jvevlINN4va@cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.eduDC: chandra@cis.ohio-state.edu (B Chandrasekaran) writes:
- BC: [H]aving goals (which is
- BC: the same as desires, I think) and knowledge (or beliefs) is orthogonal
- BC: to being conscious, I think.
-
- DC: I wouldn't say that it's orthogonal. Orthogonal implies not only that one
- DC: could have goals and knowledge without being conscious, but also that one
- DC: could be conscious without having goals and knowledge. Do you assert this
- DC: latter proposition? I think it would describe an intelligence quite
- DC: different from our own, if it were even possible.
- DC:
- DC: Rather, I would say that having goals and knowledge is a necessary, but
- DC: not a sufficient, requirement for consciousness.
-
- Yes, that is what I meant, thanks for the correction.
-
-
-