home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: chi.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!netsys!pagesat!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!machine!ddsw1!barnhart
- From: barnhart@ddsw1.mcs.com (Mr. Aaron Barnhart)
- Subject: Re: Streetwise newspaper
- Message-ID: <C18J2G.KwK@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:01:27 GMT
- References: <C17M6B.9E0@spss.com>
- Organization: Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
- Lines: 34
-
- mike@spss.com (mike cornwall) wrote:
- :If you've been in the city recently you can't help but notice vendors
- :selling Streetwise, a newspaper published to help the homeless. I seem
- :to recall reading an article on Streetwise saying that out of the dollar
- :purchase price 25 cents goes to the publisher and 75 cents goes to the
- :vendor, a homeless person. That's fine and dandy, but I continualy see
- :"homeless" vendors with $200 gym shoes and leather coats - what gives?
-
- Well, I think you need to keep lookin.
-
- It's clear from profiles in the Chicago newspapers (as well as in
- StreetWise itself) that selling the newspaper is *not* having a null
- effect on all of the vendors.
-
- So now you are at this philosophical crossroad: Is knowing that even
- one homeless vendor may be spending his money unwisely (tho' you can't
- *confirm* he paid 200 clams for those shoes and that he *didn't*
- buy the coat second-hand) sufficiently compelling to keep your money
- in your pocket, or instead does it gnaw at your conscience that you
- are withholding one dollar from your neighborhood vendor, who is
- actually feeding his family with the money and even setting aside
- $200 a month from his sales (true story)?
-
- In other words, which makes you feel worse -- supporting the bum or
- skinflinting the worthy?
-
- Aaron
-
- :
- :--
- :Mike Cornwall
- :mike@spss.com
-
-
-