home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SICS.SE!TORKEL
- Message-ID: <9301261928.AA03309@anhur.sics.se>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 20:28:06 +0100
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- From: torkel@SICS.SE
- Subject: Re: Asians
- Comments: To: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue,
- 26 Jan 93 13:13:35 -0600. <9301261915.AA17858@sics.se>
- Lines: 6
-
- >I am not saying that there is no Buddhist literature in Sanskrit, obviously.
- >I just mentioned a possibility.
-
- The Sanskrit stuff is of the same kind as the Pali, Tibetan, Chinese
- stuff. Sutras and commentaries and (to use a technical Wodehousean term)
- whatnot.
-