home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CS.UCHICAGO.EDU!SAMANT
- Return-Path: <samant@cs.uchicago.edu>
- Message-ID: <9301261041.AA21511@tartarus.uchicago.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:41:05 CST
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- From: samant@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU
- Subject: Re: In Ecstacy
- Lines: 22
-
- > >- it was the 'genieuses' three lines down that worried *me*...
- > >
- > >G
- >
- > Just for my information, why does it worry you? Are you also worried
- > by mathematicians who can't balance checkbooks?
- >
- >I'd be worried by a mathematician who sometimes wrote + for -,
- >or \Sigma for \Pi; or a high-school *arithmetic*
- >teacher who couldn't balance chequebooks. Or a bomb-disposal
- >expert whose hand shook uncontrollably. Or a phoneticist with a
- >tin ear. Or a computer programmer who doesn't initialise variables.
- >All these little signs don't inspire confidence.
-
-
- There are several mathematicians around who do sometimes write + for -
- and sigma for pi. They are still considered to be fairly satisfactory.
- Anyway, this list of things which don't inspire confidence in you is
- instructive, but how does it bear on the matter of English professors
- making typos?
-
- tushar
-