home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!COE.DREXEL.EDU!RASHMI
- X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
- Message-ID: <9301252128.AA06361@Spl3.ECE.Drexel.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:28:30 EST
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- From: Rashmi <rashmi%Spl3.ECE.Drexel.EDU@COE.DREXEL.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Tshirt colors
- Comments: To: WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu
- In-Reply-To: <9301251124.AA27924@cbis.ECE.Drexel.EDU>; from "Bernard Chien
- Perro" at Jan 25, 93 5:23 am
- Lines: 16
-
- > Of course I look more handsome in my natural coat, but it is not stamped
- > with an emblem of the list. If I can't have a shirt, I'll have to see
- > about having WORDS-L shaved into my natural fur. That idea is not appealing
-
- Ah, you want an emblem of the list on your person. In that case, Natalie'll
- have to think of something else (not shaving your fur), because dogs were
- not *meant* to wear shirts, so there. Perhaps you can get a Words-L collar.
-
- > P.S. You *do* sound specist, btw. I think Natalie looks better without
- > clothes on. Yet nobody has raised the question of why the human members
- > of the list need shirts.
-
- Here in the NE, the day has been cold with a sharp biting wind. The *only*
- member of the list who could do without a shirt today would be you, Bernard.
-
- -rashmi
-