home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!RA.MSSTATE.EDU!MAYNOR
- Message-ID: <9301251255.AA22539@Ra.MsState.Edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 06:55:46 CST
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- From: Natalie Maynor <maynor@RA.MSSTATE.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Asians
- Comments: To: WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu
- Lines: 20
-
- > To me, the appropriate name is American. I don't know why Europeans
- > (and some Canadians) insist on using that term in a narrower sense.
- > We don't; if you read a wider range of Usenet groups you'd realise that
- > it's regularly USA people who talk about Americans in contexts that exclude
- > Canada and South American countries, and it's the Europeans and Canadians
- > who take them to task over it. (We're also the ones who have to remind
-
- My experience has been the contrary. The only time I've ever referred to
- my nationality as "American" (as opposed to referring to my larger unit
- as American) was when I was *forced* to in a French class in France. The
- teacher would not let me say "Je suis des Etats-Unis," which is my usual
- response to the question "What is your nationality?" She said I wasn't
- answering the question. I realize that my usual answer is not a literal
- one, of course. She forced me to say "Je suis americaine." After class
- I discussed it with two Colombians, a Peruvian, and a Mexican, all of
- whom said adamantly, "Tu es americaine. Nous sommes Colombian [etc]."
-
- That's just one example. I could relate many similar experiences, but
- I've gotta go to class now.
- --Natalie (maynor@ra.msstate.edu)
-