home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SICS.SE!TORKEL
- Message-ID: <9301251030.AA12161@isis.sics.se>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:30:37 +0100
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- From: torkel@SICS.SE
- Subject: Re: signoff
- Comments: To: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun,
- 24 Jan 93 15:33:06 -0800. <9301250022.AA17355@sics.se>
- Lines: 28
-
- >However, I don't think netiquette itself is subtle, if the traffic
- >is so high people can't participate in it.
-
- What does volume have to do with it? Presumably, to say that
- netiquette is subtle is to say that it is not necessarily clear to an
- outsider, or can easily be explicitly stated by an insider, what is or
- is not "acceptable" or "standard" behavior - much as in other cultural
- contexts.
-
- >I would also say that if a lot of responses have to be as strong as
- >they do in order to communicate their connotations as well as their
- >denotations, that that subtlety is questionable.
-
- The degree of subtlety in messages is a matter of individual style,
- and has little to do with netiquette.
-
- >WORDS-L is only VERY secondarily what its name would suggest
- >it is about. If it were called BABBLE-L or even TOWER-OF-BABBLE-L,
- >the absence of civilised rules would make sense. As it stands, that
- >absence seems somewhat silly.
-
- There are those who prefer to talk about words or other serious
- matters only in strictly moderated groups or lists (the only way of
- enforcing "civilized rules" such as you originally envisioned). I
- think it's a good thing that some of these people should find, with
- shock and disappointment, that it is possible for a list to be named
- "words" and yet let the tone and character of the exchanges be
- determined by the sense and sensibilities of the contributors.
-