home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NEWCASTLE.AC.UK!A.C.DOWNING
- Message-ID: <emu-ct08.cg.1993.0128.092406.nacd@tuda.ncl.ac.uk>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 09:24:06 GMT
- Sender: STATISTICAL CONSULTING <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
- From: A.C.Downing@NEWCASTLE.AC.UK
- Subject: Re: testing for periodicity
- In-Reply-To: <199301262346.AA14814@cheviot.ncl.ac.uk>
- Lines: 9
-
- How about autocorrelation? I'm no expert on this, so I'm not sure
- whether or not that would just shift the problem back onto appraising
- the periodicities in the autocorrelation function, but I imagine
- such periodicities would be more obvious. (?)
-
- Tony Downing,
- Dept. of Psychology,
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
- England.
-