home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.uoregon.edu!oregon.uoregon.edu!dreitman
- From: dreitman@oregon.uoregon.edu (Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Subject: Re: Re: Health Care Reform
- Date: 28 Jan 1993 09:21 PST
- Organization: University of Oregon
- Lines: 17
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <28JAN199309210269@oregon.uoregon.edu>
- References: <MAILQUEUE-101.930126150338.672@suzy.law.ucla.edu> <93027.005421JDUTTON@YORKVM1.BITNET>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: oregon.uoregon.edu
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <93027.005421JDUTTON@YORKVM1.BITNET>,
- JDUTTON@YORKVM1.BITNET writes...
- >I'm not completely familiar with govt process and appointments in the
- >US, but shouldn't the question be not what position Ms Clinton is best
- >qualified, but rather who is the most qualified individual for the position.
- >While I've read that she is a very good lawyer, wouldn't it be in the best
- >best interest of the public good that this job be given to one of the
- >country's top lawyers? In a country that is stuffed full of lawyers, the
- >law of large numbers would dictate that she isn't one of them.
-
- Actually, she has long been recognized as one of the best. Many stories during
- the campaign pointed out that the jury of her peers put her in the top 100.
-
- >. . . .
-
-
- Dan, ad nauseum
-