home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU!U9AA
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- Message-ID: <27JAN93.11103674.0038.MUSIC@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:16:52 CST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: "rufus t. firefly" <U9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Hillary & Health Care
- Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
- In-Reply-To: In reply to your message of WED 27 JAN 1993 09:28:55 CST
- Lines: 17
-
- > IMHO, the controversy over Hillary being named as head of the Health
- > Care Task Force is raging because she's the First Lady. A lot of
- > people take a dim view of a First Lady who dares to do something other
- > than show people around and take care of the family. How many people
- > complained when Bobby Kennedy was named as Attorney General by his
- > brother?
- >
- > Evelyn Duncan
-
- *i* take a dim view of what she's doing because she appears to be
- a serious radical who could do serious damage to the country, should
- she get anywhere near the levers of power. as i recall, no one had any
- serious problems when rosalyn carter sat in on cabinet meetings and
- such. and plenty of people didn't like it when bobby kennedy was AG.
- the anti-nepotism thing was a direct result of his tenure there.
-
- rtf
-