home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU!KILBURN
- Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:KILBURN@WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU>
- X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: WVNET::IN%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET"
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GU0QJLACC2A4L7SQ@WVNVMS.WVNET.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:41:41 -0500
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: KILBURN@WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU
- Subject: Re: Bray v. Alexandria [Jamie's response]
- Lines: 11
-
- Jamie:
-
- >The first. Women-seeking-abortions are not a class in the relevant sense.
- >
- >Actually, I think Scalia was correct about THAT.
-
- Clarification, please? I know they're not a class in the taxonomic sense,
- but how does one define a class of protected persons (or whatever)?
-
- Kerry
- beginning to understand . . . :)
-