home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!BROWNVM.BITNET!ST402711
- Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:ST402711@BROWNVM.BITNET>
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%93012618442424@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:39:25 EST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: Tim Johnson <ST402711@BROWNVM.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: 7-11 guide fails again
- Lines: 30
-
- >For those who do not consult the 7-11 guide to the Supreme Court :
- > The prongs of the Lemon Test concern :
- > - a strictly secular purpose
- > - whether an act or a law advance or inhibit religion
- > - whether there is an excessive government entanglement
- > P.S.Ruckman, Jr.
-
- gosh, ps, nicely done - though jamie did beat you
- to the punch on that one. still, I wonder, if you
- were so quick with that, why have you still not
- addressed the earlier argument. really, saving your
- great argument for spring - it has me on pins and
- needles. while I personally have enormous unfounded
- confidence in your ability to point out in precise
- and irrefutable detail the errors in jamie's post
- about "workability," I think some others might like
- to see you actually follow through with it - their
- reasoning being that if you *did* know what you were
- talking about when you brought it up, there's no
- reason to wait 3 months to reveal the evidence and
- if you didn't know what you were talking about,
- maybe you ought just to admit it - particularly
- as jamie has been good enough to back up his
- argument with quotes from the case. as far as
- 7-11 guides go, they serve their purpose, and
- are certainly better than what you've offered
- to date - nothing. don't let me down, big guy.
- put jamie in his place.
-
- -Tim
-