home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bu.edu!olivea!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DESIRE.WRIGHT.EDU!DEMON
- From: DEMON@DESIRE.WRIGHT.EDU (The Integral Differential)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Subject: Re: Reagan's legacy and the politics of the SC
- Message-ID: <01GTZ3LWKV4Y006WN2@DESIRE.WRIGHT.EDU>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 16:36:09 GMT
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- Lines: 16
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:DEMON@DESIRE.WRIGHT.EDU>
- X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
- X-VMS-To: IN%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU"
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Comments: To: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
-
- > Yes! Let's appoint some qualified people to the Supreme Court.... the
- >best 9 jurists in the nation... Like the Governor of New York, for example.
- >How can you sack an SC justice?
- >
- >Tpby
-
- From what I've heard, Mario would rank on the same plane as Clarence as
- far as qualifications go. (Clarence said he thought he would be nominated, but
- not until 1995...assuming GB II, of course.)
-
- I'm not too concerned about it, though. Today's conservatives are
- tomorrows liberals and vice versa.
-
- (Anyone remember the objections to Nixon's "conservative" picks?)
-
- Brett'
-