home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU!KILBURN
- Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:KILBURN@WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU>
- X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: WVNET::IN%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET"
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GTXVO5OW36A4L73Z@WVNVMS.WVNET.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:38:17 -0500
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: KILBURN@WVSVAX.WVNET.EDU
- Subject: Re: Uncl: Business Optimism
- Lines: 20
-
- Hiya:
- Brett' wrote:
-
- > It's too bad no one pinned Bill down to a specific unemployment number.
- >
- > Let's do a list poll: what's your prediction for unemployment at the
- >end of January, 1994?
- >
- > I think it will be 8.3%
-
- Can I use a random number generator? I don't know nothin' 'bout economics
- :) Seriously -- whichever way the numbers go, what kinds of evidence can
- we legitimately use to decide who's to blame (or who's to cheer)? Honest
- question -- I suspect Clinton didn't have a whole lot to do with Sears
- stores closing (didn't they just get hit with a price-fixing bust?). On
- the other hand, if unemployment goes down, I wouldn't know where to begin
- to look for evidence that he was responsible for that.
-
- Help?
- Kerry
-