home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UKCC.UKY.EDU!MEC038
- Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:MEC038@ukcc.uky.edu>
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%93012508164337@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 08:04:12 EST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: K=A*T <MEC038@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
- Subject: Re: A Reply to J. Fisher's 18 January post on Iraq ...
- In-Reply-To: Message of Fri,
- 22 Jan 1993 17:16:04 PST from <jfisher@NETXWEST.COM>
- Lines: 25
-
- On Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:16:04 PST Jonathan Fisher said:
-
- >Yes. Remember this? Iraq _lost_ a war. He either signed the
- >cease-fire agreement or the war continued. He signed an agreement
- >stating that he wouldn't fly any planes over designated areas.
-
- I said this twice before: when you lose a war you lose much
- more than that.
-
- >But, if the UN (or the US) actually wanted three countries to come out
- >of Iraq, it would have been pretty easy to force it. Especially right
- >after the gulf war.
-
- Oops, there goes Bush's rhetoric that no border should be changed
- by force. (Not to mention that Serbia has been doing that for
- the past year or so.)
-
- >I don't think so. As I've said, Iraq lost the war. The borders are
- >created as to the wishes of the victors. There is nothing murky.
-
- There is that changing borders by force again.
-
- >Jonathan
-
- --KAT
-