home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU!NJG
- Message-ID: <MAILBOOK%93012122001747@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:58:23 EST
- Sender: RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- From: "Nick Gimbrone (WIRDI)" <NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Attribution line
- In-Reply-To: Message of Wed, 20 Jan 1993 10:40:24 CST from <G.Yanos@UIC.EDU>
- Lines: 8
-
- On Wed, 20 Jan 1993 10:40:24 CST <G.Yanos@UIC.EDU> said:
- >And, as long as I'm asking, being able to change the '>' that marks the
- >included text would also be nice. For example, I juch prefer ' >' because
- >the indention of quoted material makes it much easier for the receipitnt
- >of the mail to find my additions inserted between lines of their message.
- Ok, but some of us prefer to read replies w/ ">"... so perhaps it
- would be best if mail put out the form that the reader-to-be wanted
- (varying it for each recipient of the mail file of course ;-)...
-