home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.history
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!newstand.syr.edu!rodan.acs.syr.EDU!crdunlea
- From: crdunlea@rodan.acs.syr.EDU (Christopher R. Dunlea)
- Subject: Re: Cortez, Pizarro and Montesquieu
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.030421.28846@newstand.syr.edu>
- Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
- References: <HISTORY%93012215115606@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 03:04:21 EST
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <HISTORY%93012215115606@VM1.MCGILL.CA> Pierre Blackburn <LDAA@VM1.SI.USHERB.CA> writes:
- >In the "Discours sur les motifs qui doivent nous encourager aux
- >sciences", Montesquieu says that an important factor in the invaders
- >(Cortez and Pizarro) success was that the indigenous population
- >thought they were kind of surnatural because of their appearance and
- >technology. Is this a) false, b) partially true, c) true.
- >
- >The passage is "C'est que tout leur paraissait nouveau, un homme
- >barbu, un cheval, une arme a feu, etait pour eux l'effet d'une
- >puissance invisible, a laquelle ils se jugeaient incapables de
- >resister. Le courage ne manqua jamais aux Americains, mais seulement
- >l'esperance du succes".
- >
-
- Multiple choice...:-)
-
- My feeling is that the societal structure of the Aztec and Inca civili-
- zations made quick collapse possible. I disagree, because the Aztecs
- quickly overcame their awe of the Spaniards and attacked. The problem
- here--and even more pronounced in Peru--was that the empire was so
- stratified, and contained so much structure, that cutting off the
- head (ie, Monteczuma or the Inca) immobilized the empires' ability to
- counterattack. When you compare some of the tribes of the South
- American interior, which fought for decades after the area was
- "conquered" and had a decentralized leadership system, with the
- two empires mentioned, I think we can discount the initial psycho-
- logical effects Montesquieu describes.
-
- Chris
-
-