home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / bit / listserv / freel / 105 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-25  |  2.1 KB  |  45 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSMAILGW1.ARLUT.UTEXAS.EDU!GLOVER
  3. Return-receipt-to: "glover" <glover@msmailgw1.arlut.utexas.edu>
  4. Message-ID: <FREE-L%93012514555023@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU>
  5. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.free-l
  6. Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 1993 09:01:24 U
  7. Sender:       "Fathers' Rights and Equality Exchange" <FREE-L@INDYCMS.BITNET>
  8. From:         glover <glover@MSMAILGW1.ARLUT.UTEXAS.EDU>
  9. Subject:      RE: 1993: Year of the Divorced Father
  10. Lines: 33
  11.  
  12. Simply a motion, I'll second it.
  13. _______________________________________________________________________________
  14. To: FREE-L%INDYCMS.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU
  15. From: Fathers' Rights and Equality Exchange on Fri, Jan 22, 1993 7:15 PM
  16. Subject: 1993: Year of the Divorced Father
  17. RFC Header:Received: by msmailgw1.arlut.utexas.edu (2.00/GatorMail) with
  18. SMTP/TCP;22 Jan 93 19:14:58 U
  19. Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.PRINCETON.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
  20.    with BSMTP id 8915; Fri, 22 Jan 93 20:08:17 EST
  21. Received: from PUCC.BITNET (NJE origin LISTSERV@PUCC) by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU
  22. (LMail V1.1b/1.7e) with BSMTP id 4101; Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:26:58 -0500
  23. Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:53:49 EST
  24. Reply-To:     "Fathers' Rights and Equality Exchange"
  25. <FREE-L%INDYCMS.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
  26. Sender:       "Fathers' Rights and Equality Exchange"
  27. <FREE-L%INDYCMS.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
  28. From:         Mark Charalambous <mc@VICORP.COM>
  29. Subject:      1993: Year of the Divorced Father
  30. X-To:         free-l@indycms.iupui.edu
  31. To:           Multiple recipients of list FREE-L
  32. <FREE-L%INDYCMS.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
  33.  
  34. How about it? It would look good immediately following "Year of the Woman",
  35. don't you think?
  36. For those that might prefer "Year of the Father", or "Year of the NCP",
  37. realize that a "Year of the Divorced Father" would focus attention on issues
  38. relative to just "Fathers" and "NCPs" as a matter of course (laws are always
  39. gender-neitral, and any focusing on the plight of divorced fathers would
  40. automatically shine light on fathers in general).
  41.  
  42. What does it take to declare a "Year of...?"
  43.  
  44. --Mark
  45.