home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PITTVMS.BITNET!PLISKA1
- X-Envelope-to: EDPOLYAN@ASUACAD.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: IN%"EDPOLYAN@ASUACAD.BITNET"
- Message-ID: <01GU0MJUKJO099FT6R@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edpolyan
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:46:00 EST
- Sender: Professionals and Students Discussing Education Policy Analysis
- <EDPOLYAN@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- From: PLISKA1@PITTVMS.BITNET
- Subject: Chelsea and Private Schools
- Lines: 13
-
- I agree that perhaps the Chelsea/Private School issue is crowding the EdPoly
- system. I just wish Clinton would say why he made the choice to send her to a
- private school and perhaps that would soften the situation. Many, if not most,
- of the Presidents sent their children to private schools in and around
- Washington. Sometimes people get on their (Public School) boards in their
- hometowns yet their children go to private schools. Many times these people
- meet with criticism but when they were elected to their boards people knew this
-
- and I often wonder why they criticize later. Clinton did not say ahead of time
- that Chelsea would attend a private school if he was elected. Perhaps if he
- had and said why then people would understand.
-
- Ann
-