home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!HOUVMSCC.VNET.IBM.COM!ALANO
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GTTLCITO4Y99DJTK@asu.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edpolyan
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:48:10 -0600
- Sender: Professionals and Students Discussing Education Policy Analysis
- <EDPOLYAN@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- From: ALANO@HOUVMSCC.VNET.IBM.COM
- Subject: Parents, School, and Government
- Lines: 25
-
- Michael G Hines wrote ===>
-
- > The responsiblity of the government is to realize their roll (sic) in
- > education. They are simply service providers, who compete against
- > alternative service providers (mentioned above).
-
- Yes, you can think of public schools as a service, but it's not like other
- "services" that we encounter in our world today. It's more like the
- following. Suppose for $1000/year AT&T will provide your phone
- service. Say you have another choice, MCI, that is also $1000/year.
- Now you can choose either. If you choose AT&T, great! If you choose
- MCI, that's great too, but (oh, by the way) you still have to pay your
- $1000/year to AT&T regardless. Public schooling is not just one
- service among many. It is one that has the characteristic of being
- "free" in that it won't cost you any more or less if you use this
- "service". If you go to a private school or involve yourself in
- homeschooling, you still have to pay for the public school.
-
- For public schools to be a service in the sense you're talking about
- (i.e., where one is allowed take their education tax dollars with
- their child and buy the "service" they want) would require a major
- shift in the philosophy of schooling in the US. In other words: NOT!
-
- Alan Ogletree
- Houston, TX
-