home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CBOS.UC.EDU!SYSMGR
- Return-Path: <SYSMGR@cbos.uc.edu>
- Message-ID: <199301271039.AA28278@cbos.uc.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.allmusic
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:38:00 -0800
- Sender: Discussions on all forms of Music <ALLMUSIC@AUVM.BITNET>
- From: SYSMGR@CBOS.UC.EDU
- Subject: Recipient mailbox is full. Returning message to sender
- Lines: 17
-
- On Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:31:03 GMT Hendrik Jan Veenstra said:
-
- >O, and another funny example crosses my mind. I've always loved "Golden Brown"
- >from the Stranglers -- a plain 3/4 with an occasional 4/4 mixed in, which
- >"throws you off your feet" somehow. I always thought they deserved to have
- >a hit with this song, not just because (as opposed to nearly all other 'pop')
- >they use a strange (and basically non-commercial) time-division, but also
- >because the song is centered around vocals and harpsichord (which isn't too
- >commercial either IMO :).
-
- Oh, I dunno, Leonhart & Harnoncourt seem to do ok with it (-:
-
- Actually, it is just this mixing of time that catches me the most about
- early music, where nothing is all that regular any more once you get to the
- Renaissance; even dance music has usually got a switch from duple to triple
- or vice versa somewheres along the way. You build a lot of energy into the
- music when you do this sort of thing. . . .
-