home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ERS.BITNET!MAINT2
- Message-ID: <ALLMUSIC%93012110453351@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.allmusic
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:55:10 EST
- Sender: Discussions on all forms of Music <ALLMUSIC@AUVM.BITNET>
- From: Ken Koester <MAINT2@ERS.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Timothy Leary
- In-Reply-To: Message of Fri,
- 15 Jan 1993 10:45:53 EST from <skovitz@MAGNUS.ACS. OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Lines: 28
-
- On Fri, 15 Jan 1993 10:45:53 EST Sonia Kovitz said:
- >>
- >> Ken sed:
- >>
- >> >> If I don't reply to mail, you'll know I'm not
- >> >>being uppity.
- >> >>
- >> >>Sonia
- >> >
- >> >Lessee. . . if you *do* reply to mail, then you *are being uppity? (-:
- >>
- >> no... no... dearest kenny baby poopsie,
- >>
- >> ~A -> ~B is not equivalent to A -> B... it is equivalent to B -> A though, so
- >> that means that if sonia *is* being uppity then she is replying to her mail..
- >.
- >> the case exists where sonia could be replying to her mail and is not uppity a
- >nd
- >> this would make your statement logically false (though intuitively, most peop
- >le
- >> would think it mean the same fucking thing).
- >>
- This can be so iff one allows oneself to be trammeled by that old Aristotelian
- 2-valued thing--how mundane (-:
- >
- >don't ever believe anything Sonia says.
- >
- Yer a little late with that one, Sonia, my little choux-fleur (-:
-