home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!biosci!agate!eos!data.nas.nasa.gov!splatter.nas.nasa.gov!bross
- From: bross@splatter.nas.nasa.gov (Bill Ross)
- Newsgroups: ba.singles
- Subject: Re: Questions from a disillusioned newbie
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.013615.25815@nas.nasa.gov>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 01:36:15 GMT
- References: <93021.56402.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>
- Sender: bross@splatter.nas.nasa.gov (Wilson S. Ross)
- Organization: NAS Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
- Lines: 16
-
- In J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:
- |> I've been reading this newsgroup for a couple of weeks now, and all I see
- |> is flame, flame, flame. Is that standard here?
- |>
-
- Oh, no - more criticism (some sort of smile). Is that really a question?
-
- |> Is it always necessary to wear a flame retardant suit here?
-
- Depends on what you want to discuss, I imagine. Perhaps one would
- be safe avoiding criticism of others. However, I have a theory that
- singleness may be associated w/ hypercritical examination of others,
- based on my own case. Not to say any particular flames are _wrong_,
- but being right can be a curse.
-
- Bill Ross
-