home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!sun-barr!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!netcomsv!netcom.com!desiree
- From: desiree@netcom.com (dmc)
- Newsgroups: ba.singles
- Subject: Re: Isn't Danny cute... (was Re: Danny tries to be sneaky (was Re: )
- Summary: Makes you wanna blow the stars from the sky...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.232844.29182@netcom.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 23:28:44 GMT
- References: <1jkj2vINNldb@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1jmjshINN1aj@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1jn3v8INNcpt@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Organization: SNCF
- Lines: 71
-
-
- Dannyboy comes back with an article which attempts to be witty and
- humourous:
-
- (this is getting to be like poking sticks at small rodents...)
- evil, nasty, but loads of fun...
-
- >I said:
- >>In his recent article, Danny "I've learned to plagiarise" Holmes sez:
-
- >Here we see the testicle-filled, I mean testosterone-filled-desiree trying
- >to pawn off the watchfull eye of the with-life community by trying to stear
- >the attention to a copied idea.
-
- Geez Danny, make up your mind. I know it's difficult to discern
- if I am a man or a woman (and don't believe my name either), but do
- try to keep things straight. (Je sais, it's difficult for you...)
-
- And Danny, why on earth would I want to "pawn" off the watchfull
- [sic] eye of *anything*? As you have so thoughtfully pointed out, I
- do not have a life -- so any attention I could grab -- from whatever
- community -- would fill my need for acceptance and attention.
-
- And, DarkHole, I've -yet- to see an original idea or phrase
- come out of your pudgy, nicotine stained fingers...
-
- >> Uh, Danny -- your Mayberry stuff was much more fun. At least
- >>it was original and had some small shred of ability to conceive...
-
- >At his point, the TFD is trying to get Jim and I to leave this style and
- >return to a past style that has long been gone. We also notice that a
- >slight frustration in the no-life member. This may be due to our not
- >acknowledging her as a true member of society....but then again, what
- >with-lifer would.
-
- Partly right. Mostly wrong. At this point (who's point?),
- I would like to see you come up with something that is original and
- amusing. Can you take on that PepsiChallenge, Dannymebucko? Eh?
-
- And yes, I generally get frustrated with members that show
- no life...
-
- >> This recycled bit has been done. Try again. This time without
- >>hitting alt.flame for snippets.
-
- >We also see a desparate attempt at trying to get the WL community to leave
- >by playing this string off as recycled. But as long as our public continues
- >to keep our ratings up by supportive e-mail, Jim and I will continue our
- >documentary on the No-Life community.
-
- T'wasn't desperate -- was the truth. But now I am intrigued --
- if the "with-life" community have such "lives", why are you cool and
- groovy people wasting your valuable "with-life" time playing with the
- likes of us "without-lives" folks?
-
- Are you just getting tired of inbreeding? I did hear that
- a bunch of sheep in Sonoma County are up for grabs Dannyboy and
- JimBob -- you may want to cash in while you can...
-
- >Our next segment will be covering the no-life females who feel that they
- >must be the masculine types in the no-life relationship.
-
- But do make sure that you write it up easily enough so that we
- can understand which part you are playing and which JimBob is playing.
- Ohhhh - More Adventures in LJBF ...
-
-
- Desiree
-
-
- N.B. My definition of LJBF -- not the dweebs...
-