home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!news.bbn.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: between, among
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.044307.9929@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <Mildred_Thill-240738131021@madadm02.educ.ualberta.ca>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:43:07 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <Mildred_Thill-240738131021@madadm02.educ.ualberta.ca> Mildred_Thill@ACT.EDUC.UALBERTA.CA (Mildred Thill) writes:
- >A few days ago, a parents group I belong to got into a bit of an arguement
- >about how to use beween and among. Some of us thought that between should
- >be used only when referring to two things, but not three or more. However
- >some said that in the sentence, "We want to improve communication among
- >teachers, parents and the members of the community", 'between' would work
- >just as well, with the proviso that it emphasized the two way communication
- >between each possible pair in the group.
-
- The latter is correct. The "between=two" idea was imposed retroactively
- by grammar teachers and has never reflected actual usage. See the OED
- for an excellent exposition of the distinction. AHD calls the "between=2"
- rule "a widely repeated but unjustified tradition."
-
- Roger
-