home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!rhb
- From: rhb@world.std.com (Robert H Brueckner)
- Subject: Re: a/an exceptions
- In-Reply-To: briand@tekig5.pen.tek.com's message of 25 Jan 93 22:10:27 GMT
- Message-ID: <RHB.93Jan25203124@world.std.com>
- Sender: rhb@world.std.com (Robert H Brueckner)
- Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
- References: <30724@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan25.170300.3332@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
- <C1FD2v.35x@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <8447@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:31:24 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <8447@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> briand@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Brian D Diehm) writes:
-
- Believe it or not, some folks pronounce "historical" without an aspirated
- "h." This makes the word "iss-torical", and by the phonetic rule then is
- preceded by "an." These same folks, who usually laugh at the Cockneys for
- dropping their "h"s, also pronounce "hotel" as "oh-tell." An hotel. Go figure.
-
- Of course, here I reveal my left-of-the-Atlantic provincialism.
-
- The whole thing with "a" vs "an" is because it is difficult to slide from
- one vowel sound to another without a consonant between. In the case of "h"
- words, it is particularly difficult to slide from soft "a" to aspirated "h."
- "An" provides the consonant.
-
-
- OK, then how do you explain people who use "an" *and* aspirate the
- "h"? This is the only way I've heard "an" used in this context. The
- "h" is never elided, though it is pronounced quickly, gliding from "n"
- to "i" and nearly getting lost.
-
- RB
-
- --
- |"The truth is cruel, but it can be loved, and it makes free those who |
- | have loved it." -- George Santayana // Opinions expressed here, when |
- | clear and persuasive, are my own. --Rob Brueckner (rhb@world.std.com) |
-
-