home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!au500
- From: au500@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Linda Zinn)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Learning the ropes of "Ins and Outs"
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 18:39:03 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
- Lines: 33
- Message-ID: <1js3c7INNfe@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- References: <1js1usINNskg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Reply-To: au500@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Linda Zinn)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- In a previous article, ca831@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven John Peterson) says:
-
- >
- >Please, help!!!!!!!
- >
- >I had a disagreement with a fellow co-worker over how the
- >phrase "ins and outs" should appear on a photo caption.
- >
- >My preferred choice was "in's and out's," while he
- >argued that since the words were neither possesive nor
- >contractions the phrase should read "ins and outs."
- >
- >I couldn't argue with his logic, but to me, the words
- >ins and outs look very strange. Which is correct and
- >why? (*sigh* I think I already know the answer....)
-
- Sorry, but your coworker was correct. "Ins" and "outs"
- are simply plurals of "in" and "out," so there's no
- need for an apostrophe.
-
- We often think a certain punctuation, spelling, etc., is
- correct because a) we have habitually punctuated or spelled
- something incorrectly, b) we have often seen (or heard)
- an incorrect usage, or c) because someone changed the doggone
- rules after we finished school (this one's a bear, but it seems to
- provide plenty of topics for discussion on this newsgroup).
-
- --
- ________________________________________________________________________
- * Linda Zinn When you point a finger at someone, *
- * au500@cleveland.freenet.edu you're pointing three back at yourself *
- * ******Wanted: Books by E.D.E.N. Southworth; cattail dinnerware****** *
-