home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.tasteless.jokes,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: The word FUCK
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.201233.8416@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <C17wKo.F89@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:12:33 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <C17wKo.F89@ecf.toronto.edu> murtaza@ecf.toronto.edu (MURTAZA HASAN) writes:
- >B
- >References: <1993Jan19.150727.25914@seachg.uucp> <1993Jan20.102239.1@wombat.newcastle.edu.au> <C16A6L.HAu@ecf.toronto.edu>
- >
- >I've heard from an artsie friend that the original inhabitants of Britain
- >(the Angles and Saxons) used the word FUCK as a normal part of their
- >language.
-
- Well, they certainly didn't write it, and there are quite a few Anglo-Saxon
- texts.
-
- (btw, could you make shorter lines part of *your* language? Thanks.)
-
- >When the Normans came over and conquered, English went underground
- >and was spoken only in the fields,
- >with French in the castles and palaces. therefore, Fuck became LOW class.
-
- Then why did English continue to be written? Only high-class folks
- knew *how* to write. Sorry, that one doesn't work. French was
- perhaps spoken at court, but elsewhere English was the usual
- language, incl. at most castles. (They didn't do palaces in those days.)
- English became creolized by blending with French; that was the big change,
- and why we don't speak Anglo-Saxon now.
-
- > So the word is merely an anachronism. Feel free to use it.
-
- Why is it an anachronism? Don't people fuck anymore?
-
- And thanks for your permission.
-
- Roger (who has plenty of artsie friends, but also a dictionary...)
-
-
-