home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: Have to
- Message-ID: <1993Jan20.164059.14522@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1993Jan20.135433.8397@pixel.kodak.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 16:40:59 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1993Jan20.135433.8397@pixel.kodak.com> john@liebnitz.ssd.kodak.com (John Hall) writes:
- >Do you pronounce the word "have" differently in the following
- >statements?
-
- > I have two apples.
-
- > I have to leave.
-
- >Here in western New York I hear the first as "hav", but the second as
- >"haf".
-
- >Has anyone else observed this? Can you explain it?
-
- Sure. The key is the vowel sound in "two/to." There's hardly ever a
- stress on the infinitive "to," so it winds up being more or less a
- schwa sound. (That is, it almost disappears/gets swallowed.) "Two"
- in the first sentence is stressed (why else mention the number; if the
- number isn't important, you say "I have apples." If you split them
- with a knife, you say, "I halve apples," with yet another pronunciation,
- but that's getting out of our range.); that gives one the
- necessary time to voice the 'v'.
-
- Or something like that.
-
- Roger
-