home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!m2c!bu.edu!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!marcia
- From: marcia@netcom.com (Marcia)
- Newsgroups: alt.romance
- Subject: Re: Curious?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.231108.5242@netcom.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 23:11:08 GMT
- References: <1jmt1uINNrhj@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> <728047933.1943@minster.york.ac.uk>
- Organization: The Dolphin Conspiracy, Phase II
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <728047933.1943@minster.york.ac.uk> aaron@minster.york.ac.uk writes:
- >I for one, and I noticed someone who agreed with this, find independent
- >women more attractive than dependent. Someone who has enough of a
- >personality and self esteem to go out and do things for themselves tends
- >to be more interesting than someone who becomes dependent or feels the
- >world owes them something. It is one thing to be willing to compromise
- >in a relationship but another to be totally malleable. I want someone
- >to speak up for themselves. I don't want to go out with someone that is
- >so weak that I unaviodably wield ultimate power because that is not what
- >I want to do. (Far more likely to be the other way round)
-
- And if you substitute "men" for "women" in the second line above, it still
- holds true.
-
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Marcia Bednarcyk ADDRESSES: marcia@netcom.com
- "Sweaty Snugglebunnies." mlb@cisco.com
-