home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!str-ccsun!dct.ac.uk!aesbl1ajm
- From: aesbl1ajm@dct.ac.uk
- Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.metal
- Subject: Re: Steve Vai? OK. GET SOME SATRIANI, BUD.clo
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.181953.3192@dct.ac.uk>
- Date: 28 Jan 93 18:19:53 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.111150.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> <1993Jan26.192837.10586@news.cs.brandeis.edu> <phlegm.728082732@cs1.bradley.edu>
- Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <phlegm.728082732@cs1.bradley.edu>, phlegm@cs1.bradley.edu (Kevin Bourrillion) writes:
- > st923559@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
- >
- >>I unfortunatly have not heard much of Vai to give my opinion.
- >
- > The main difference I can see between Vai and Satriani is that Steve
- > Vai overproduces his songs big time.. there's usually a million
- > synthesized effects, and voices, and even cannons in one song. Joe S.
- > is mostly just straight-out guitar rock n' roll (the way I like it).
- >
- > --
- The one problem that Steve Vai has got is that when he is recording, he
- stops about every 5 notes or so to check all the levels, whereas Satch
- just records, the vast majority of the stuff of Blue Dream where other
- musicians were used was done in one _take_ such as the bass in Bells of Lal.
-
- Steve's problem is that everything has got to be perfect.
-
- Adam McCormack
- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-