home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!brunel!monge.brunel.ac.uk!ee90crr
- From: ee90crr@monge.brunel.ac.uk.ac.uk (Christopher R Ringrose)
- Newsgroups: alt.rave
- Subject: Re: Rave composition
- Message-ID: <C1Er4t.GAt@brunel.ac.uk>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 11:41:14 GMT
- References: <1993Jan21.164411.13023@maths.tcd.ie>
- Sender: news@brunel.ac.uk (News supervisor)
- Reply-To: ee90crr@monge.brunel.ac.uk.ac.uk
- Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: monge.brunel.ac.uk
-
- In article 13023@maths.tcd.ie, malxtt@maths.tcd.ie (Malcolm Tyrrell) writes:
- >
- > The problem with the present U.K. rave scene is that the emphasis on the
- > writing of the music is on quantity rather than quality. Those who write
- > music for raves find that if they take too long writing a tune it is in
- > yesterday's style. Those who write music for public release find they must
- > continually flood the market with their tunes or their name becomes obsolete.
- >
- > What I desire is a rave tune nutured from birth and brought up lovingly
- > by its creator. Consistant in its mood, less emphasis on concept-sampling,
- > and more individual in its style.
- >
- > What I want is a rave composition: composed, not written or programmed in!
- >
- > malxtt@maths.tcd.ie
-
-
- This is all well and good - but firstly well written turnes arnt necessarily what
- people like! If you want an example of something written in an afternoon see POING
- by RTS and see how well that did!
-
- Also simplicity is also the key sometimes (ref most acid) - if you overwrite
- i often find tunes getting over crowded and turning into noise. Half the game is
- in getting the instrument sound right not just the notes...
-
- Sound of Gigha '93
-