home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!m2c!bu.edu!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!yamauchi
- From: yamauchi@ces.cwru.edu (Brian Yamauchi)
- Newsgroups: alt.politics.libertarian
- Subject: Prisoner's Dilemmas & The Deficit (was Re: [misc.activism.progressive] Clinton Office Requests Comments)
- Message-ID: <YAMAUCHI.93Jan26233729@yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 04:37:29 GMT
- References: <1993Jan16.050257.12101@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- <1993Jan18.060428.13963@midway.uchicago.edu>
- <1jf4ceINNpfd@armory.centerline.com>
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University
- Lines: 42
- NNTP-Posting-Host: yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu
- In-reply-to: mrh@centerline.com's message of 18 Jan 93 20:36:30 GMT
-
- In article <1jf4ceINNpfd@armory.centerline.com> mrh@centerline.com (Mike Huben) writes:
- >It all boils down to the prisoner's dilemma. Cultures that
- >have methods of dealing effectively with the prisoner's dilemma would
- >outcompete those which did't. Example methods include persecution of
- >traitors and spies, enforcement of taxes for public goods, etc.
-
- >The prisoner's dilemma is a fine example of how the fallacy of composition is
- >erroneous. Separated individuals are not faced with the dilemma, and can't
- >even play the game. As soon as they are together, the game emerges.
-
- One practical question is whether government eliminates the prisoner's
- dilemma or merely raises the game to another level. I agree with your
- argument (in other posts) that it is naive to assume that humans will
- always behave honestly in their interactions with others -- but it
- seems even more naive to assume that these same "dishonest" humans
- will act "for the common good" simply because they are acting in
- groups.
-
- Consider the dynamics involved with taxation and government spending.
- For any voter, the highest payoff strategy is the one which maximizes
- the positive difference between the amount of benefit received from
- the government and the amount of taxes paid to the government. This
- is a classic prisoner's dilemma in that if a portion of the electorate
- decides to give up benefits or pay more taxes, its sacrifice will be
- likely to be absorbed by the "defections" of the rest of the
- population -- without long-term benefit to the economy. So those who
- "cooperate" lose twice: once because they sacrifice in terms of
- immediate benefits or taxes, and again because they suffer the
- same long-term economic consequences with everyone else.
-
- Given this situation, $300 billion dollar deficits and a $4.2 trillion
- national debt aren't surprising at all. I wouldn't be surprised to
- see trillion dollar deficits by the turn of the century...
-
- Politics: n. A conflict of interests disguised as a contest of
- principles. -- Ambrose Bierce
- --
- _______________________________________________________________________________
-
- Brian Yamauchi Case Western Reserve University
- yamauchi@alpha.ces.cwru.edu Department of Computer Engineering and Science
- _______________________________________________________________________________
-